Charles Darwin versus the Bible 11.26.06.

11/26/06

To begin with, experimentally Darwin has difficulties. Since the beginning of hte 20th century, experimenters have used fruit flies to experiment with in an attempt to prove darwin is correct.
There seems to be a problem, since fruit flies produce a new generation about every 10 to 14 days, there should have been at least 2782 generations of fruit flies between the year 1900 and the year 2006. And you do not have a new species that has evolved from the fruit flies, so basically you still have only fruit flies. Darwin in chapter 2 of the Origins of Species, has said there is no distinction between varieties and species when there is not much difference.
Let me list the type of differences found in the fruit flies and this will illustrate that you have variety in the species fruit flies [Drosophila]:
some have shortened longitudinal wing veins
some have a pale yellow body
some have black bodies
some have narrow veticale eyes
some have reduced wings
some have various brisltes absent
some have white eyes
some have apricot eyes
There is no non trivial body structure changes in the 2782 generations of fruit flies.

Another area of problems with Darwin has to do with if precision information can be random in assembling the DNA code.
Observations from the world tells us:
In the case of writing an encyclopedia, actions of intelligence is required.
In the case of writing a computer program intelligence is required.

Since the DNA of the simplest life forms requires the information of about 1000 encyclopedias why should i think that it occured by randomness?

To add irony, in SETI [search for extra terrestrial intelligence] if they recieve simple signals from outerspace that form a simple pattern [such as an example is signals recieved occur in quantities that correspond to prime numbers] would declare that intelligence was discovered.
The irony lies in simple messages is an indication of intellegence but something as complicated as DNA is declared to be due to randomness.

Also experimentally origins of life experiments have failed to produce life from non living chemicals

The Bible's reliability again: book of Ezekiel vs Russia

11/25/06

Yesterday news: Russia has already started delivery of air defense missles to the Iranian government to protect the Iranian nuclear sites. The type of missle is Tor-M1 which is a low to medium altitude surface to air missle. [repoeted by ITAR-TASS newsagency] There will be 29 units as reported.

Does this have anything to do with what the Bible predicts will occur in human history?
YES. Look in the book of Ezekiel chapter 38 and 39.

Chapter 38 verse 15 and 16: [King James] Russia will invade Israel from the north in the last days.
Who will Russia's allies include? Persia [currently called Iraq and Iran] which is found in Ezekiel chapter 38 verse 5.

And the indications is the Bible is correct again.

2006 Elections

11/14/06

Besides the sudden end of the claim of suppression of the vote in 2006 here is what Ann Coulter pointed out:
1938 FDR's Democrats lost 71 seats in the house
1958 Eisenhower"s Republicans lost 47 seats in the house
1966 Kennedy/Johnson Dem's lost 47 seats in the house
1974 Nixon/Ford Repub's lost 43 seats in the house
1986 Reagan's Repubs lost 5 seats in hte house
1994 Clinton [supposed a genius] Dems lost 54 seats in the house
2006 Bush's Repubs lost 36 seats in the house.

So the Democrats didn't have a large success but only a moderate success.

Now for a breakdown:
of the 36 seats Dems won in 2006 in the house
4 came from New York
4 came from Pennsylvania
4 came from NewEngland [2 in Conneticut and 2 in New Hampshire]
5 came from republican seats that had no incumbent in the 2006 elections
Therefore there are 17 of the 36 seats lost in mostly John Kerry voting areas.

Therefore I find that the Democrats really isn't getting much support for what Howard Dean calls Jesusland.